Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-ID:	<38CD87BE.B69B05A7@sigma6.com>
Date:	Mon, 13 Mar 2000 19:28:46 -0500
From:	Jeff Sturm <jsturm AT sigma6 DOT com>
Organization:	sigma6
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.04 [en] (WinNT; I)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cgf AT cygnus DOT com
CC:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: [ANN] PW32 the (alternative) Posix-over-Win32 layer 0.3.0 released
References:	<20000313180414 DOT 15800 DOT qmail AT web107 DOT yahoomail DOT com> <20000313180414 DOT 15800 DOT qmail AT web107 DOT yahoomail DOT com> <9886 DOT 000313 AT is DOT lg DOT ua> <4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 20000313181326 DOT 00b8a590 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <20000313185555 DOT B24233 AT cygnus DOT com>

Chris Faylor wrote:
> I have no problem with comparative benchmarks (and I don't think that
> cygwin will be a speed demon).

Don't be so sure.  I've used GCC on Interix for a while... let's just
say that Cygwin rocks.

The Interix product relies heavily on the POSIX subsystem, instead of
shared memory as Cygwin does.  For many of my user applications the
subsystem process actually consumes more CPU time than the application!

Presumably, the tradeoff is between performance and security.  Interix
isn't vulnerable to the same exploits as Cygwin.

--
Jeff Sturm
jsturm AT sigma6 DOT com

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -