Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From:	Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Date:	Thu, 2 Mar 2000 13:14:32 -0500
To:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Cc:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna AT vinschen DOT de>
Subject:	Re: [ANN] perl5.5.660
Message-ID:	<20000302131432.C20207@cygnus.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
References:	<38BE0783 DOT 3D27966D AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 20 DOT 0003020125150 DOT 19895-100000 AT frontal DOT ibb DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.1.4i
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.4.20.0003020125150.19895-100000@frontal.ibb.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 01:53:31AM -0500

On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 01:53:31AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Same binary, but this time with CYGWIN='binmode tty ntea ntsec'

Corinna, shouldn't ntea and ntsec be mutually exclusive?  Should we
change the DLL so that only one or the other can be active?

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -