Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-ID:	<38B58694.48478A1E@openmarket.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 Feb 2000 14:29:24 -0500
From:	"Guy T. Moore Jr." <gmoore AT openmarket DOT com>
Organization:	Engineering
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.61 [en] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	rebuilding cywin v1.0: where is sh.exe

Hi!

I am succumbing to editing c:\Cygwin\src\bash\make_cmd.c in order to 
get past this \r problem that I am experiencing using CLearCase's clearmake
from within a BASH window.
(ClearCase/Rational have acknowledged the problem, ClearCase defect # CMBU00030189,
 but have refused to fix it. Nice.)

I've run into a few snags:

1.)
I've noticed that the Cygwin v1.0 that I just purchased behaves somewhat differently
than the version B20 that I was using previously.
It seems that Cygwin v1.0 was mounting the C:\Cygwin in "binary" mode rather
than "text!=binary" as did the Cygwin B20.
Anyone else notice this? 

(I unmounted this, otherwise I couldn't even use Cygwin's make to build my stuff
 without encountering an assert in read.c.)

2.)
OK so then I edit c:\Cygwin\src\bash\make_cmd.c and put in changes that I got
from this email list and then kicked off a full build.
  cd c:\Cygwin
  src\rebuild.bat

It built everything with just a couple of errors. 
   (I think I am not that concerned with those errors.)

The make'ing of the "install" target failed because it couldn't find "sed".
Anyone know about this error?

3.)
After the build I have no sh.exe under c:\build1.
I do have a new bash.exe but it is the sh.exe that I would like to use (I think)
in my makefiles as "SHELL=sh.exe".
Anyone know if sh.exe is supposed to get rebuilt and how it differs from
bash.exe?


Comments?


Guy Moore
OpenMarket

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -