delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
Message-ID: | <01b801bf5f86$ce274640$983c1818@rochester.rr.com> |
From: | "Terry Lincoln" <lincoln2 AT rochester DOT rr DOT com> |
To: | "TOMMY REYNOLDS" <tommy DOT reynolds AT adtran DOT com>, <mingw32 AT egroups DOT com>, |
"Todd Bandrowsky" <tbandrowsky AT del DOT net> | |
Cc: | <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com> |
References: | <46476C008A10D311BD0A0000C0775CF9DD6E72 AT srv-exchange DOT adtran DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: [mingw32] Re: [RFC] changing gcc default output executable name (a.exe now) |
Date: | Sat, 15 Jan 2000 13:31:52 -0500 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 |
All, I fully agree with all 4 points. I also feel it important to this: if we *really* want another M$-LoseDoze compiler clone, then someone (Mumit maybe?) can/should submit a "wgcc" variation; something built from GCC but does everything the M$-LoseDoze way. Since it shouldn't then be expected to be UNIX-y you can change most of the defaults without breaking existing code that makes assumptions about gcc's workings. Regards, ----- Original Message ----- From: TOMMY REYNOLDS <tommy DOT reynolds AT adtran DOT com> To: <mingw32 AT egroups DOT com>; Todd Bandrowsky <tbandrowsky AT del DOT net> Cc: <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 10:03 AM Subject: RE: [mingw32] Re: [RFC] changing gcc default output executable name (a.exe now) > I'd vote just the opposite: make an "a.out" file in both instances, because: > 1) that's what > UNIX does, it's expected; 2) that's what UNIX does, it's documented; 3) > typing "a.out" > under WinDo$e will run the file any - we don' need no steekin' suffixes > anymore; and 4) it > doesn't break anything we're trying to port from UNIX anyway.. > > This is just one more "exactly the same as UNIX but with one subtle > difference" nuisance. > > -- > Want to unsubscribe from this list? > Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com > > -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |