Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From:	"Andre Oliveira da Costa" <costa AT cade DOT com DOT br>
To:	"Chris Faylor" <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Cc:	<rbh00 AT netcom DOT com>, <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject:	RE: [mingw32] Re: [RFC] changing gcc default output executable na me (a.exe now)
Date:	Fri, 14 Jan 2000 17:58:48 -0200
Message-ID:	<001201bf5ec9$c5a69790$8400000a@costa.cadenet.com.br>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
In-Reply-To:	<20000114140728.A1858@cygnus.com>
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Importance:	Normal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
> [mailto:cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com]On Behalf Of Chris Faylor
> Sent: Friday, January 14, 2000 5:07 PM
> To: Andre Oliveira da Costa
> Cc: rbh00 AT netcom DOT com; cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
> Subject: Re: [mingw32] Re: [RFC] changing gcc default output executable
> na me (a.exe now)
>
> We were talking about having gcc understand an environment variable or
> command line switch causing it to avoid producing a .exe extension.  It
> is not going to be the default.  Nothing is going to change unless you
> set this.

Looks fine to me, I can live with that ;) Let the default be the current
behavior, and people who don't need/want .exe suffixes automatically
appended to executables (like me) can have some variable set on their
.bashrc files that would turn off this automatic feature.

> Then, of course, the mailing list will be flooded with lots of "newbies"
> who have found out about this nifty new environment variable and who
> 1) have an older version of gcc which doesn't understand it, 2)
> have makefiles
> which add the .exe file explicitly, or 3) are facing in the wrong
> direction
> and are unable to see the computer screen.

[1] they would be on the same situation we are today: they'd like not to
have the .exe appended, but would have to tweak makefiles for that

[2] these should work with no changes, since they are supposedly able to
handle executables with the .exe suffix

[3] these should be killed. Slowly ;)

Regards,

Andre
--
André Oliveira da Costa
(costa AT cade DOT com DOT br)


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -