Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From:	"Andre Oliveira da Costa" <costa AT cade DOT com DOT br>
To:	<cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject:	RE: [mingw32] Re: [RFC] changing gcc default output executable na me (a.exe now)
Date:	Thu, 13 Jan 2000 19:37:22 -0200
Message-ID:	<003201bf5e0e$603c7070$8400000a@costa.cadenet.com.br>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Importance:	Normal
In-Reply-To:	<20000113163016.A31403@cygnus.com>

> If someone wants to submit a patch to the gcc maintainers I'm sure that
> they will give it their attention.
>
> In fact, if you Cc me, I will talk to people at Cygnus about it and try
> to advocate that it be installed.
>
> I would suggest that somebody who feels strongly about it should start
> working on this ASAP.

That's good. Any volunteers? I'll try to take a look at it ASAP (which might
take sometime... please, if anybody else has the chance, feel free to do it
first). But, who is the actual responsible for appending the .exe suffix,
gcc or ld? Also, I'd like to propose a change from GCC_SUFFIX to EXE_SUFFIX.
What do you (Chris, Earnie, cygwin-community) think?

Andre
--
André Oliveira da Costa
(costa AT cade DOT com DOT br)


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -