Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From:	N8TM AT aol DOT com
Message-ID:	<0.b515680a.256eed39@aol.com>
Date:	Thu, 25 Nov 1999 14:51:21 EST
Subject:	Re: Re[2]: cygwin on 95 slower than NT
To:	paul-ml AT is DOT lg DOT ua, skumar2 AT hotmail DOT com
CC:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	AOL 4.0 for Windows sub 31

In a message dated 11/25/99 11:56:21 AM EST, paul-ml AT is DOT lg DOT ua writes:

> EB> Real Solution: Migrate the Win95 to WinNT.
>  
>      Tell that my boss.
>  
>  EB> Win95 itself is slower than WinNT. 

Not necessarily, but Win2K should run faster.

Tim
tprince AT computer DOT org

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -