Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From:	N8TM AT aol DOT com
Message-ID:	<0.d76a415f.256bf3a8@aol.com>
Date:	Tue, 23 Nov 1999 08:42:00 EST
Subject:	Re: cygwin on 95 slower than NT
To:	skumar2 AT hotmail DOT com, cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Windows AOL sub 44

In a message dated 11/22/99 11:29:05 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
skumar2 AT hotmail DOT com writes:

> On windows 95 the shell scripts are
>  considerably slow
I'm sure people will want more information than this; e.g. did you read the 
FAQ, which version of 95, did you install the Y2K patcher, and, if 
applicable, the USB add-on, and maybe the cygcheck output.

Tim
tprince AT computer DOT org

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -