Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From:	JSONCRAIG AT aol DOT com
Message-ID:	<0.51b99ea6.255de33e@aol.com>
Date:	Fri, 12 Nov 1999 16:40:14 EST
Subject:	more problems with gprof
To:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 10

Are -pg and gprof fully implemented in Mingw32?  I tried to profile a simple 
C program (compiling/linking with -pg, running it, running gprof) and it 
always says no time accumulated and 0% of the programs running time was spent 
in each function on the call graph.  Now, I know this can't be right because 
they were all called multiple times.  
gprof -i test.exe returns:
File `gmon.out' (version 0) contains:
        3 histogram record
        1 call-graph record
        0 basic-block count records <----- is this the problem?

Is it fully implemented or am I doing something wrong?

Thanks,
Jason Craig

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -