Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-ID:	<3822EE61.13DED2F4@agames.com>
Date:	Fri, 05 Nov 1999 06:49:05 -0800
From:	"David O'Riva" <oriva AT agames DOT com>
Organization:	Atari Games, Inc.
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: b19 versus b20
References:	<38228D3D DOT D9D3C37D AT inst DOT hospvd DOT ch>

Jean-Pascal Laedermann wrote:
> 
> Hi !
> 
> I've compared the executables for this simple code generated by cygnus
> win b19 versus b20. The b20 executable is about 20 times long as the 
> b19 one !
> 
> [...]

I'm seeing the same thing - the rcs binaries produced with GCC 2.95 are
more than twice as large as the ones produced with an early version of
egcs for Cygwinb19.

However, after stripping off debug info ("strip <name>.exe"), the
executables suddenly become _smaller_ than equivalently stripped b19
executables.  Overall, I take this as a Good Thing, since the Insight
debugger is a helluva lot more useful to me now than B19's gdbtk ever
was...


-- 
-dave        _________________________
------------/      David O'Riva       \--------------
408-        | Staff Software Engineer | oriva@
 473-9413   |    Atari Games, Inc.    |   agames.com
            \_________________________/

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -