Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Date:	Mon, 1 Nov 1999 04:16:38 -0800 (PST)
From:	"Daniel C. Sinclair" <uf657 AT victoria DOT tc DOT ca>
X-Sender:	uf657 AT vtn1
To:	Colin Peters <colinp AT ma DOT kcom DOT ne DOT jp>
cc:	GNU-win32 <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>,
	Khan Mumit <khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu>
Subject:	RE: mingw32 DLL getting main args?
In-Reply-To:	<LOBBLDDPANDBNCLMBAGPKEDICCAA.colinp@ma.kcom.ne.jp>
Message-ID:	<Pine.GSO.3.95.iB1.0.991101040605.20874A-100000@vtn1>
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Sun, 31 Oct 1999, Colin Peters wrote:

> The reason DLLs call getmainargs to parse the command line list
> is so that they can provide the MS-like _argc and _argv variables for
> access by functions within the DLL. Check init.c, which is #included
> (yuck) in dllcrt1.c. If you like you can remove the declarations from
> stdlib.h and work up a DLL version of init.c to remove the dependency
> of your DLL on the C run-time library. (I suspect this hasn't changed
> in Mumit's version, I must admit I only checked my source.)

Why support something that is non-standard? This is supposed to be a
minimalist Win32 compiler. Just because VC++ has _argc and _argv doesn't
mean everyone else has to. There are other ways to get the command line
too. The most standard being just saving argc/argv in global variables
yourself. There is also GetCommandLine(), CommandLineToArgv(), etc...

> I suppose the other reason I didn't worry much about this was that I
> wasn't expecting people to write much DLL code without calling any
> C library functions.

Many Win32 functions do the same thing as the C runtime functions. I'm
using some of those. I have heard that a program and DLL should not use a
different C runtime DLL - bad things can happen. My DLL will be used by
many people with different compilers, even different languages. So I don't
want my DLL importing anything from a C runtime DLL. 

Daniel


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -