Mail Archives: cygwin/1999/10/29/17:34:48
I think I know the problem you are talking about, I had a Makefile that
referenced /bin/gcc instead of just gcc - that seemed to cause a -remap
error.. Weird though.. This is not that one.. It really has to be
something pretty stupid..
-----Original Message-----
From: Suhaib Siddiqi [mailto:sssiddiqi AT ipass DOT net]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 1999 5:23 PM
To: Mike MacDonald; cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject: RE: permissions
No idea. Maybe some GCC guru like Mumit could help.
I do remember a while ago getting the -remap error, but the problem
was
in my Makefiles. I do not remember what exactly I did to fix it.
Suhaib
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
> [mailto:cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com]On Behalf Of
> Mike MacDonald
> Sent: Friday, October 29, 1999 4:57 PM
> To: 'cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com'
> Subject: FW: permissions
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike MacDonald
> Sent: Friday, October 29, 1999 4:55 PM
> To: 'ssiddiqi AT nspm DOT ipass DOT net'
> Subject: RE: permissions
>
>
> Not in makefiles.. It happens when I create a file named
> mtest.c with:
>
> void f(){}
>
> and then do:
>
> gcc -o mtest mtest.c
>
> And I get the errors :(
>
> I did a cpp -v and a gcc --version and the versions matched up..
> Everything is mounted binary..
>
> Its weird.. I really don't want to reinstall again.. I
> may have a library
> floating around or something that I don't know about.. I
> went through and
> checked all the major ones though..
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Suhaib Siddiqi [mailto:sssiddiqi AT ipass DOT net]
> Sent: Friday, October 29, 1999 4:33 PM
> To: Mike MacDonald; 'Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)'
> Cc: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
> Subject: RE: permissions
>
>
>
> -remap must somewhere in your Makefiles. Check configure scripts.
> make sure you have only one and the latest version of cpp.exe in
> your PATH.
> If you are using network mounted drive, Cygwin may run
> slow. When I
> compile a big project on my Windows Nt machine, i always first
> logout
> from Netware server and unmount the netware mounted
> drives... for me
> it helped.
>
> Suhaib
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
> > [mailto:cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com]On Behalf Of
> > Mike MacDonald
> > Sent: Friday, October 29, 1999 4:22 PM
> > To: 'Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)'
> > Cc: 'cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com'
> > Subject: RE: permissions
> >
> >
> > Cool, thanx! The latest snapshot is much faster than my
> > older one, but
> > compiling still takes up like 100% of my P2 450 with
> > 256mb of ram.. Am I
> > doing something wrong?
> >
> > Also, when I install any version of gcc 2.95 (pgcc or
> > gcc) it doesn't work..
> > I get a bunch of cpp doesn't understand -remap errors and
> > it dies.. egcs
> > 2.91 works fine.. I tried everything, and I'm sure I'm
> > using the right
> > libs, and cpp.exe and everything..
> >
> > Know anything about these things?
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) [mailto:lhall AT rfk DOT com]
> > Sent: Friday, October 29, 1999 4:09 PM
> > To: Mike MacDonald
> > Subject: RE: permissions
> >
> >
> > Yes, ntsec is on by default in the snapshots. Unless you
> > have things set
> > up just right, this will cause trouble. You can find
> > info about how to
> > set things up for ntsec in the mail archives (can't
> > remember if it was the
> > cygwin list archives or the cygwin-developers list
> > archives though). If
> > you don't care about using ntsec, its fine to turn it off
> > as you have...
> >
> > Larry
> >
> >
> > At 04:00 PM 10/29/99 -0400, you wrote:
> > >Well, I have it working now I think..
> > >
> > >Its the latest dll.. It just doesn't set permissions
> > properly.. I think
> > >its disabled now, and I think its set up right, but I
> > dunno.. I put the
> > >nontsec in my CYGWIN variable, and set the permissions
> > through nt.. Now it
> > >SEEMS to be working..
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) [mailto:lhall AT rfk DOT com]
> > >Sent: Friday, October 29, 1999 3:44 PM
> > >To: Mike MacDonald
> > >Subject: Re: permissions
> > >
> > >
> > >At 03:36 PM 10/29/99 -0400, you wrote:
> > >>I'm having a hell of a time with getting permissions to
> > work right under
> > >>nt.. Can I disable them?
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >Depends on what you mean by "permissions" and what DLL
> > you're using. Can
> > >you be more specific?
> > >
> > >
> > >Larry Hall lhall AT rfk DOT com
> > >RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com
> > >118 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 -
> > RFK Office
> > >Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX
> > > (508) 560-1285 -
> > cell phone
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> > Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
> >
>
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
>
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
- Raw text -