Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-ID:	<3819B35E.66E11332@sabre.com>
Date:	Fri, 29 Oct 1999 10:46:55 -0400
From:	Jason Bucata <Jason DOT Bucata AT sabre DOT com>
Organization:	Sabre Inc.
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.5 [en]C-CCK-MCD (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: Compiling Sendmail With Cygwin?

I've received a few responses, including two copies of a patch that'll allow
Sendmail 8.9.3 to compile.  So I guess the answer is "Go try it" :).

My next concern is performance/efficiency.  How much of a performance hit
does the Cygwin "subsystem" take on Sendmail?  What about the fact that
Sendmail uses processes instead of threads (which most NT-based systems I've
seen prefer)?  Etc., etc.

If anyone has any actual experience, or even just some thoughts, in this
regard, please share.

Jason B.




--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -