Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-ID:	<001d01bf201c$3da415c0$27acdfd0@oemcomputer>
From:	"Suhaib M. Siddiqi" <ssiddiqi AT ipass DOT net>
To:	"Steve Jorgensen" <steve AT khoral DOT com>
Cc:	<cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
References:	<199910261840 DOT MAA09312 AT benson>
Subject:	Re: X11 for cygwin CD 1.0
Date:	Tue, 26 Oct 1999 21:40:23 -0400
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211

yes, the reasons are X servers are still unfucntional.  The libs and clients
will
work only with B20.1.  For Cygwin CD 1.0 you need ss-dev.tar.gz

Is it a good idea to orgaize all the Cygwin realted X11 stuff at one place
under cgwin-xree?  It may help avoid these confusions, I am noticing
recetly?

Suhaib


----- Original Message -----
From: Steve Jorgensen <steve AT khoral DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 1999 2:40 PM
Subject: X11 for cygwin CD 1.0


> I know that this list has been told to use the
> x11r6.4-cygwin-ss-dev.tar.gz version of Xwindows for the cygwin
> 1.0 cd, but before it was discussed on this list, I found the
> pre-alpha-xfree-cygwin-b20.1.tar.bz2 version.  While the Xserver
> itself is in the pre-alpha stages, the libraries and clients seem
> to work as well or better than the x11r6.4-cygwin-ss-dev.tar.gz
> version.  Is there some reason why we should not use this
> pre-alpha-xfree-cygwin-b20.1 version?
>
> The x11r6.4-cygwin-ss-dev.tar.gz version can't run xterm, it just
> complains about not being able to find an appropriate termcap
> entry, even after I added one. Also the header files produce
> tons of annoying warnings, because they lack return types on
> several function declarations, which produce warnings about
> assuming int for the return type.
>
> I thinking about sticking with the pre-alpha version,
> because the above reasons, but I wanted to make sure
> there aren't any hidden gotcha's.. :)  Thanks for any
> information.
>
> Steve
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> Steven Jorgensen      steve AT khoral DOT com     steve AT haunt DOT com
> ------------------------------+----------------------------
> Khoral Research Inc.          | PHONE: (505) 837-6500
> 6200 Uptown Blvd, Suite 200   | FAX:   (505) 881-3842
> Albuquerque, NM 87110         | URL: http://www.khoral.com/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
>


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -