Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From:	Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Date:	Sun, 24 Oct 1999 21:05:19 -0400
To:	Brian Kasper <bpkasper AT netscape DOT net>
Cc:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: X11R6.4 for Cygwin Release v1.0? (And thanks)
Message-ID:	<19991024210519.A8798@cygnus.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	Brian Kasper <bpkasper AT netscape DOT net>,
	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
References:	<19991024164429 DOT 20269 DOT qmail AT wwcst088 DOT netaddress DOT usa DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Mutt 0.95.6i
In-Reply-To:	<19991024164429.20269.qmail@wwcst088.netaddress.usa.net>; from Brian Kasper on Sun, Oct 24, 1999 at 09:44:29AM -0700

On Sun, Oct 24, 1999 at 09:44:29AM -0700, Brian Kasper wrote:
>Chris Faylor wrote:
>I have to assume the STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION error is due to
>some incompatibility between the B20 DLL's or libraries and
>those from the 1.0 release -- the program experiencing the
>error compiles and runs without error using 

There's an incredibly easy way to tell -- run the program under
gdb.  There's no reason to assume anything.

>  B20.1 and Mr Siddiqi's B20-specific X11R6.4/Lesstif
>  Microsoft Visual C++ 6.0 and X11/Motif libs from Hummingbird
>  XFree86 / Lesstif on both Intel and Alpha Linux boxen
>
>so I don't *think* the error is in my code.  I also recompiled
>everything I could (my own executable code and my library code);
>the only important part I have not recompiled is the
>X11R6.4/Lesstif stuff.
>
>In short, I get an error-free link with code that I trust pretty
>well, and it dies due to an S_A_V error every time I run it under
>release 1.0.  Not to appear argumentative, Chris, but I'm not sure
>your statement "if it links, you're ok" is 100% true.

I guess we'll never know if you are unwilling to actually debug the
problem.

Sadly, since there is no more data than "It doesn't work" I guess
I can guarantee that you'll experience the same problem when
the next release comes out in a few weeks.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -