delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/1999/09/27/16:21:32

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-ID: <37EFD216.8AA5858A@ece.gatech.edu>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 16:22:46 -0400
From: "Charles S. Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mumit Khan <khan AT thor DOT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu>
CC: Kevin Wright <kwright AT aspectdv DOT com>, cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject: fork/exec fixed? [was Re: How to build static lib's]
References: <199909271931 DOT OAA11630 AT mercury DOT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu>

Mumit Khan wrote:

> 
> This problem is due to a bug in cygwin-b20, and is fixed in recent
> snapshots. In most cases, it is quite harmless (unless you're creating
> subprocesses using fork/exec, in which case odd things may happen).
> 

Does this mean that the old fork/exec problem that plagued cygwin-perl a
while back is fixed in recent snapshots? Not fixed? Partially fixed?

Reference: "fork + dlls" thread on May 21-23, 1999.

--Chuck

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019