delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/1999/09/15/20:56:35

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-ID: <37E04038.E99DED63@pop.scriptics.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 17:56:24 -0700
From: Mike Thomas <wart AT scriptics DOT com>
Reply-To: wart AT scriptics DOT com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.5-15 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject: test -w broken on bash?

I'm running cygwin-b20 on Windows NT.  When I run the bash.exe included
in the package, I see the following behaviour:

bash% umask
000
bash% touch foo
bash% if test -w foo ; then echo foo ; fi
bash%

No echo.  The file exists, but "test -w" doesn't think it's writable.

But when I run sh.exe from the same Cygwin installation:

sh% umask
0000
sh% touch foo
sh% if test -w foo ; then echo foo ; fi
foo
sh%

The echo is there.

Is this a bug in bash or is it intended behaviour?  Does test -w have a
different meaning under bash?

--Mike

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019