delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, |
<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs> | |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
From: | Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com> |
Date: | Sun, 5 Sep 1999 22:24:56 -0400 |
To: | Victor Szel <info AT szelvesz DOT hu> |
Cc: | cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
Subject: | Re: BUG: open() O_ flags one bit too high |
Message-ID: | <19990905222456.A1738@cygnus.com> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | Victor Szel <info AT szelvesz DOT hu>, |
cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com | |
References: | <002a01bef73b$13244db0$0a0ac8c8 AT VECWS1> <19990905021026 DOT A8934 AT cygnus DOT com> <005e01bef777$eff7b5b0$0a0ac8c8 AT VECWS1> <19990905130618 DOT A754 AT cygnus DOT com> <01d001bef808$79161630$0a0ac8c8 AT VECWS1> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Mailer: | Mutt 0.95.6i |
In-Reply-To: | <01d001bef808$79161630$0a0ac8c8@VECWS1>; from Victor Szel on Mon, Sep 06, 1999 at 03:38:07AM +0200 |
On Mon, Sep 06, 1999 at 03:38:07AM +0200, Victor Szel wrote: >> If you're using cygwin headers in a non-cygwin (aka mingw) application, >> then, um, that's wrong. You should be using another set of headers. >> I'm sure that someone will coment on this and let you know which they >> should be. > >Yeah really strange. > >One more idea: we are linking MOLDNAME lib, couldn't that be a problem. >BTW we are including <mingw32/share.h> and <fcntl.h>, so the flags should >be OK, but it seems that the open() function is executed from the MFC DLL >which uses different flag values. As far as I can see, the mingw headers match the VC++ headers. Both define O_CREAT as 0x100. It sure sounds like you are not using the mingw headers. -chris -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |