delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/1999/09/05/04:57:57

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>,
<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From: thunder7 AT xs4all DOT nl
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 1999 10:44:33 +0200
To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject: trouble with __builtin_frame_address - solution found
Message-ID: <19990905104433.A821@middle.of.nowhere>
Reply-To: thunder7 AT xs4all DOT nl
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i

It seems that if I check if the upper 2 bytes of
__builtin_frame_addresses stay the same, I can get by. I lose the last
entry on the stack, but that's not in my program anyway.

Still, this seems like a bad kludge.

Jurriaan
-- 
I'll be Bach.
        Johann Sebastian Schwarzenegger

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019