| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com> |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, |
| <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs> | |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
| Message-ID: | <005e01bef777$eff7b5b0$0a0ac8c8@VECWS1> |
| From: | "Victor Szel" <info AT szelvesz DOT hu> |
| To: | <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com> |
| References: | <002a01bef73b$13244db0$0a0ac8c8 AT VECWS1> <19990905021026 DOT A8934 AT cygnus DOT com> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG: open() O_ flags one bit too high |
| Date: | Sun, 5 Sep 1999 10:23:29 +0200 |
| Organization: | Szelvesz Bt. |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| X-Priority: | 3 |
| X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
| X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2918.2701 |
| X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2918.2701 |
Chris,
> >#ifdef __CYGWIN__
> >/* TODO: Get Cygwin fixed so that this bug fix won't be needed */
> >static inline int FixCygwinIOflags( int flags )
> >{
> > /* Starting with O_CREAT, the Cygwin I/O flags are 1 bit too high */
> > return ( ( flags & 0x1FF00 ) >> 1 ) | ( flags & 0xFF );
> >}
> >#endif
>
> System O_CREAT (octal) O_CREAT (hex)
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Cygwin 01000 0x200
> Digital UNIX 01000 0x200
> FreeBSD 01000 0x200
> Irix 00400 0x100
> Linux 00100 0x040
> SCO UNIX 3.2 00400 0x100
> Solaris 00400 0x100
> Ultrix 01000 0x200
>
> What was the bug again?
It could be that it's some sort of feature/bug in WinNT and not in Cygwin then,
since the O_CREAT flag passed to open() was 0x200, but open always
returned -1 in this case. WinNT 4.0 SP5 and Win2000 Build 2072 is the
same in this respect. If this is the case, a workaround in Cygwin could be
worth considering.
Victor Szel
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |