Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>,
	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From:	"Suhaib Siddiqi" <ssiddiqi AT ipass DOT net>
To:	"Charles Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>, <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject:	RE: New snapshots and old binaries
Date:	Mon, 30 Aug 1999 11:45:27 -0400
Message-ID:	<NDBBLHPPKKBKPBLLMFJBOEHCCCAA.ssiddiqi@ipass.net>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To:	<37CAA241.60AA07A6@ece.gatech.edu>
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Importance:	Normal

*>
> Chris Faylor wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 03:08:20PM -0400, Charles S. Wilson wrote:
> > >Will I need to recompile ALL of these libraries and executables before
> > >my system returns to "normal", or what?
> >
> > If the DLL is named cygwin1.dll it will be backwards compatible.  If the
> > cygwin DLL does not work with a .exe that uses cygwin1.dll then that's a
> > bug in the DLL.
> >
>
> According to Suhaib:
> ************
> I do not know about /usr/local, but X11R6 needs a recompilation
> or you will
>
> get a __ctype__ undefined references when linking, uncurses work from
> B20.1.
> You can get X11r6.4 for snapshot from my web site at siddiqi.webjump.com.
> Most of the X11 and motif stuff for cygwin snapshots is available there.
> Jpeg, tiff
> and png will need recompilation.
> ************
>
> I guess that signifies a bug in cygwin1.dll?


I do not think it is a bug?  In B20.1 it was __ctype
and in recent snapshots, (snapshot starting from mid february 99)
it became __ctype__
I do not know what was the reasoning behind chaning __ctype to __ctype__.

Anyway, I had most of the necessary libs recompiled for snapshots
to avoid __ctype__ issue.

Suhaib

>
> --Chuck
>
>
>
>
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
>


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -