Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>,
	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-ID:	<37C01A9F.136ABAB@di.fct.unl.pt>
Date:	Sun, 22 Aug 1999 16:43:27 +0100
From:	Nuno Bandeira <nb AT di DOT fct DOT unl DOT pt>
Organization:	Faculty of Science and Technology / New University of Lisbon
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: How efficient is the g++ compipler in cygwin?
References:	<37BF5F4E DOT 9E1862F1 AT engmail DOT uwaterloo DOT ca>

  Hi Leo,

Leo Jingyu LEE wrote:
> I have compiled the same program using both VC++ 6.0 (release version)
> and g++ in cygwin, and found that the g++ version takes about three
> times as much time as the VC++ version to run.  The program is basically
> computionally intensive with some file reading/writing.  Any commments
> on this?

  I have the same problem but it looks to me that it is a more general 
efficiency problem. How fast is your cygwin on other operations, like listing 
a folder with a lot of files (ls -l /windows, for example) ? For me its also 
a lot slower than running dir c:\windows in command.com.
  And lets not mention executing bash scripts...
  Anyway, if I have to choose, I'll still go for cygwin.

  Best regards,

---
Nuno Bandeira
nb AT di DOT fct DOT unl DOT pt

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -