Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>,
	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-ID:	<37B19B04.1AB8C53A@inspirepharm.com>
Date:	Wed, 11 Aug 1999 11:47:16 -0400
From:	"Suhaib M. Siddiqi" <ssiddiqi AT inspirepharm DOT com>
Organization:	Inspire Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.07C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX64 6.5 IP28)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	ssiddiqi AT ipass DOT net, cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: Nutcracker Vs cygwin
References:	<465C3B178FD4D21192B40008C79FD87E149642 AT ehqmsg01 DOT europe DOT stortek DOT com>

Parr, Ian D wrote:
> 
> Has anyone performed an evaluation/comparison of both products ?
> Would they care to share their findings ?
> 
> Regards
> 
> Ian Parr


Yes.  Bascially you are on your own.  NutCracker(NC), so does UWIN,
lacks the GNU tools support.  That means most of the source codes
can be compiled with less efforts with Cygwin.

Also the X Windows system support is same in NC, you need their X-server
to run the applications.  You also need to their versions of
X11 and MOTIF to port.  In Cygwin you have access to all these tools
(X11) with much less restrictions.

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -