Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>,
	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From:	Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Date:	Sun, 1 Aug 1999 23:40:04 -0400
To:	JSONCRAIG AT aol DOT com
Cc:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: Simple license question
Message-ID:	<19990801234004.A19311@cygnus.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
References:	<7aa87d1a DOT 24d5ef62 AT aol DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Mutt 0.95.6i
In-Reply-To:	<7aa87d1a.24d5ef62@aol.com>; from JSONCRAIG@aol.com on Sun, Aug 01, 1999 at 02:43:46PM -0400

On Sun, Aug 01, 1999 at 02:43:46PM -0400, JSONCRAIG AT aol DOT com wrote:
>I'm going to be using a third-party API that uses .lib files for static 
>linking.  Does using Coling Peter's impdef to build .a libraries count as 
>reverse-compiling or reverse-assembling of the .lib files?

I don't see why it would.  If I understand what impdef does, it is just
exposing functions in the DLL which are meant to be used by other
programs.

cgf
(Who is not a lawyer)

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -