Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>,
	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From:	N8TM AT aol DOT com
Message-ID:	<474ac402.24cf7500@aol.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 Jul 1999 16:48:00 EDT
Subject:	Re: Is Cygwin-32/b19 & 32/b20 Year 2000 Compliant?
To:	dj AT delorie DOT com, monireh AT sgi DOT com
CC:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com, gactor AT esd DOT sgi DOT com
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	AOL 3.0 for Windows 95 sub 18

In a message dated 99-07-26 18:17:51 EDT, dj AT delorie DOT com writes:

<< We have a Y2K policy at
 http://www.cygnus.com/y2k.html but it only covers our purchased
 products (i.e. GNUPro for Windows). >>
Does SGI have a y2k policy for any products not under a current paid-up 
licence?  Does anyone?   Actually, there do appear to be some problems with 
the file dating etc. in cygwin which would have to be solved in any 
commercial release, but that could well affect our freedom to use it wherever 
we can, even on W95 and W2K.

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -