Mail Archives: cygwin/1999/06/24/18:58:44
Actually, I tried a sample of the snapshots I found on
ftp://go.cygnus.com/pub/sourceware.cygnus.com/cygwin/snapshots/ from the
following list of dates:
0523 0524 0526 0528 0529 0530 0531 0601 0602 0603 0604 0605 0607 0608 0610
0612 0614 0615
I assumed that if it failed at the endpoints and also in the middle that it
failed everywhere. After reading your email, I thought maybe I'd go out and
try every one. It appears that the snapshot on 5/28 does *not* have the
fhandler_base::fork_fixup bug. Thanks for spurring me on!
Hopefully, 5/28 doesn't have any other new major bugs, either.
-- John
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Faylor [mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 1999 3:13 PM
> To: John Wiersba
> Cc: cygwin users
> Subject: Re: cat broken
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 24, 1999 at 03:02:58PM -0400, John Wiersba wrote:
> >OK, then it appears that every snapshot since 5/24 has this
> bug in it. I'm
> >not exactly sure why it is showing up so frequently in my
> environment. I
> >saw this virtually every time when piping
> > ls | grep | perl
>
> You've actually tried every snapshot from 5/24 and 6/15?
> Wow. I can't
> duplicate this problem, FWIW. It works fine for me.
>
> >Could these two bugs be related? It seems that when the
> terminal emulation
> >bug went away, simultaneously the
> bug appeared.
>
> Probably not.
>
> -chris
>
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
- Raw text -