Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-ID:	<37680A14.6E904CFE@acm.org>
Date:	Wed, 16 Jun 1999 16:33:24 -0400
From:	"D. Richard Hipp" <drh AT acm DOT org>
Organization:	Hwaci
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 3.0Gold (X11; U; Linux 2.0.36 i686)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
CC:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: "sed" bug?
References:	<19990616192340 DOT 14656 DOT rocketmail AT web119 DOT yahoomail DOT com> <3767FB78 DOT EE70381 AT acm DOT org> <199906162012 DOT QAA29978 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>

DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
> > I don't understand.  "sh" is "bash" on both Linux and Cygwin20, is
> > it not?  I'm not running csh if that is what you are asking.
> 
> sh and bash are different in cygwin.  sh is really "ash", which is
> like bash but doesn't have all the interactive bits in it, making it a
> much smaller and leaner shell, good for scripts.

OK.  That's good to know.  When I type:

    bash //H/gd/acd/fu/re/configure

instead of just

    //H/gd/acd/fu/re/configure

everything appears to work.  So is this a bug
in ash?  Or is the imcompatibility intentional?

Thanks everybody for your help.
-- 
D. Richard Hipp -- drh AT acm DOT org -- http://www.hwaci.com/drh/

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -