Mail Archives: cygwin/1999/06/11/05:17:59
Hello!
I did some benchmarks in order to compare egcs 1.1.2 with gcc 2.95.
The last one is much slower than egcs 1.1.2 (except in one test). Why are
the binaries (with full optimisation) so slow with gcc 2.95?
On which egcs branch is it based?
Regards,
William
William Gacquer
Ubi Studios - Ubi Soft Entertainment
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mumit Khan [SMTP:khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT EDU]
> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 1999 11:00 PM
> To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
> Subject: [ANN] gcc-2.95 1999-06-09 dev snapshot for Cygwin
>
> I've uploaded GCC-2.95 (upcoming merged egcs and gcc release) dev snapshot
> binaries for Cygwin for those who want to see what's new and what's hot.
> Since the release of gcc-2.95 has been pushed back quite a bit due to the
> merging of FSF GCC and EGCS GCC, this may be a chance to check out the
> new features without having to wait a few weeks (at the very least).
>
> This is *only* meant for developers who may want to try out the newer
> features that will be part of the real release (such as the capability
> to create COM interfaces); expect problems, bugs, and so on. Please don't
> download unless you're willing to live on the edge.
>
> ftp://ftp.xraylith.wisc.edu/pub/khan/gnu-win32/cygwin/snapshots/gcc-2.95-1
> 9990609/
>
> Regards,
> Mumit
>
>
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
- Raw text -