Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-Id:	<199906090134.SAA07555@aleph.ssd.hal.com>
Subject:	Re: tolower function
To:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Date:	Tue, 8 Jun 1999 18:34:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<001401beb20e$c71e4a90$e145ce84@ECE.McGill.CA> from "Peter Kabal" at Jun 8, 99 08:26:55 pm
From:	"J. J. Farrell" <jjf AT bcs DOT org DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.4 PL23]

> From: "Peter Kabal" <kabal AT ece DOT mcgill DOT ca>
> 
> In an early version of a function to convert a string to lowercase, I did
> not properly convert the input (signed) characters to unsigned before
> handing them off to the tolower function.  I discovered that tolower behaves
> oddly for negative input values.  For instance tolower(-32) returns zero,
> while tolower(-31) returns -31.
> 
> Perhaps tolower should be fixed to behave "properly" for "improper" inputs.

That's easily done by defining it's current behaviour as
proper, as an extension to C!

The value of the parameter to the ctype functions must be
representable as an unsigned char, or must be EOF. Any other
value results in undefined behavior.

Contributors efforts are probably better spent enhancing the
functionality rather than extending standard interfaces to
make incorrect code behave in some predictable way.

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -