Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From:	Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Date:	Mon, 29 Mar 1999 22:20:42 -0500
To:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna DOT vinschen AT cityweb DOT de>
Cc:	"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>,
	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: B20: mv deletes files on error (NT)
Message-ID:	<19990329222042.A2607@cygnus.com>
References:	<3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 19990329184811 DOT 00a1d360 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 19990329192524 DOT 00a1b9b0 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <37002186 DOT C647122A AT cityweb DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Mutt 0.95.3i
In-Reply-To:	<37002186.C647122A@cityweb.de>; from Corinna Vinschen on Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 02:57:42AM +0200

On Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 02:57:42AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> 3. If everyone agrees that the best thing to do is modify "mv" and this is
>>    the only change necessary to make sure "mv" doesn't break as a result,
>>    how come its not part of the change?  Shouldn't the goal be to improve
>>    Cygwin rather than taking one step forward and then one step back?
>
>The change was invented in a b21 winsup snapshot. This isn't a official
>release and has nothing to do with the implementation of GNU fileutils.
>This is another point.

Actually, was it even your change, Corinna?  I can't find it in the
ChangeLog.

Has someone come up with a patch for `mv' yet?  If so, please send it to
me with a ChangeLog entry and I'll get it into Cygnus's sources and look
into getting it into the FSF sources as well.

As I mentioned in a previous post, I don't think there is any way to
modify Cygwin to work around the current behavior.  This requires an
`mv' modification.

-chris

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -