Mail Archives: cygwin/1999/03/29/18:18:02
--- "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com> wrote:
--8<--
> One person's feature is another's bug! I guess now I understand what the
> goal of making this change was. I have to say, for the number of times that
> hard links are used (especially in Win 9x), I can't say that I think the
> change is for the better. Still, I have no problem with adding functionality
> to cygwin (in general or in this case specifically) so long as it doesn't
> remove functionality. I think if we need to make sure we can use hard links,
> we need to be able to do this without sacrificing something that is
> functionally useful. At the very least, if nothing else can be found, we
> need a switch, even though I hate this idea in general. Mind you, I'm not
> against adding the ability to make use of NTFS hard links but why do we need
> to support this at the expense of existing functionality? I think this
> change needs to be revisited.
--8<--
It's easy enough to modify the code for mv.c. I know this (moving from one CASE
to the other case) works on NT but how about 9x?
===
- \\||//
-------------------o0O0--Earnie--0O0o-------------------
-- earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com --
----------------------ooo0O--O0ooo----------------------
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
- Raw text -