Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-ID:	<36E5C12D.5017@uni-duesseldorf.de>
Date:	Wed, 10 Mar 1999 01:47:41 +0100
From:	Stipe Tolj <tolj AT uni-duesseldorf DOT de>
Reply-To:	tolj AT uni-duesseldorf DOT de
Organization:	Department of Economical Computer Science, University of Cologne,
	Germany
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 3.01 (Win95; I)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
CC:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: [ANN] Cygwin DEV survey
References:	<36E2B26B DOT BEA9DC67 AT uni-duesseldorf DOT de> <199903071805 DOT NAA13212 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <36E30CB6 DOT 1B5F AT uni-duesseldorf DOT de> <199903080113 DOT UAA15742 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>

DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
> The reason I specified full sources for all application is because
> when you build an application with cygwin, the resulting binary always
> includes sources from cygwin (namely, the startup code and import
> library stubs), so all applications thus compiled must be distributed
> under the terms of the GPL.

ok, this point is quite clear and should be accepted by anyone using
cygwin, me too. So I suppose we will compile a set of software which is
definitly distributed under the terms of GPL.

Now what about the xforms 0.881 cygwin pre-compiled port we have
provided to the xforms authors. They will only allow distribution of the
pre-compiled binary but not the patched cygwin port sources. This would
mean they would violate GPL since we have used cygwin b20.1 to compile
it?!

Regards,
Sttipe

-- 
Stipe Tolj <tolj AT uni-duesseldorf DOT de>

Cygwin Porting Project -- "We build UNIX on top of Windows"
http://www.student.uni-koeln.de/cygwin

Department of Economical Computer Science        
University of Cologne, Germany



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -