Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-ID:	<013801be5ea8$3b8e22c0$29acdfd0@InspirePharm.Com>
From:	"Suhaib M. Siddiqi" <Ssiddiqi AT InspirePharm DOT Com>
To:	"DJ Delorie" <dj AT delorie DOT com>
Cc:	"cygwin" <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Cygwin participation threshold
Date:	Mon, 22 Feb 1999 16:13:45 -0500
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.0810.800
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.0810.800

>
>> Their product does not depend on Cygwin, but it does provide
>> switches to use Cygwin headers and libraries for porting purposes.
>> The fact is they got a commercial F77 and F90 which can use Cygwin
>> headers and libraries, makes it a really attractive product.
>
>In that case, it still acts to mkae cygwin more popular, which
>hopefully means that more people will use it in general, etc.
>

Absolutely true.  I guess PGi is the only product right now which offers
a
Cygwin compability, with F77/F90 and HPF for single and multiprocessors
machines.

That was the reason i decided to go for it.  To be honest G77 still lags
behind a normal F77 compiler.


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -