delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
Date: | Mon, 22 Feb 1999 14:38:33 -0500 |
Message-Id: | <199902221938.OAA08386@envy.delorie.com> |
X-Authentication-Warning: | envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | Ssiddiqi AT InspirePharm DOT Com |
CC: | cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <008401be5e87$f1dcd510$29acdfd0@InspirePharm.Com> |
(Ssiddiqi AT InspirePharm DOT Com) | |
Subject: | Re: Cygwin participation threshold |
References: | <008401be5e87$f1dcd510$29acdfd0 AT InspirePharm DOT Com> |
> What about third party products. For example PGI Workstation comes > bundle with Cygwin. Who gets the *paid support* in that case? In cases where companies write software that depends on cygwin, such as the example you give, the potential customer for Cygnus would be that company, for two reasons: (1) they would need a commercial license for cygwin, and (2) they would want a support contract to make sure the cygwin they include in their product doesn't make their product look bad by having bugs. It would be unrealistic to expect each individual user of that software to come to Cygnus for support. More likely, they'd go to the package producer, who may have solutions specific to their software/cygwin bundling, such as a custom-fixed dll. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |