Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-ID:	<008401be5e87$f1dcd510$29acdfd0@InspirePharm.Com>
From:	"Suhaib M. Siddiqi" <Ssiddiqi AT InspirePharm DOT Com>
To:	"DJ Delorie" <dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>, "Paul Sokolovsky" <paul-ml AT is DOT lg DOT ua>
Cc:	"cygwin" <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Cygwin participation threshold
Date:	Mon, 22 Feb 1999 12:22:34 -0500
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.0810.800
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.0810.800

>
>> Hopefully, that's what you wanted - to give people a nice tool,
>
>I think it would be more accurate to replace "give" with "share with".
>
>As a bit of history, Cygnus had a purely business reason to create
>cygwin.  Doing so let us host our tools on 95/NT platforms, which
>meant more customers (i.e. more money).  AFAIK, releasing cygwin to
>the net had two reasons: the first philosophical, in that we like to
>share; and the second practical, in that the more people using cygwin
>the more paid support contracts we'll get.


What about third party products. For example PGI Workstation comes
bundle with
Cygwin. It uses better commercial compilers and one has a choice to use
GCC/G77
or PGCC/PG77/PGF90 etc.  Who gets the *paid support* in that case?
I am just a bit curious!

Regards
Suhaib




--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -