Delivered-To:	listarch-cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Message-ID:	<19990216191158.C15986@cygnus.com>
Date:	Tue, 16 Feb 1999 19:11:58 -0500
To:	hcobb AT telegenisys DOT com
Cc:	dwsharp AT iee DOT org, cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: sources
References:	<36C856B3 DOT E5010221 AT dddandr DOT octacon DOT co DOT uk> <19990215231439 DOT B11574 AT cygnus DOT com> <199902160908 DOT 5731104 DOT 6 AT www DOT web-alive DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Mutt 0.93i
In-Reply-To:	<199902160908.5731104.6@www.web-alive.com>; from Henry J. Cobb on Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 09:04:54AM -0800

On Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 09:04:54AM -0800, Henry J. Cobb wrote:
>There were a few versions of /bin/sh (well, one per vendor at least).
>
>Which /bin/sh will you model your efforts on?

I'm not aware of much disparity between /bin/sh's.  The one exception
that I am aware of is on Ultrix which we hardly need to consider.

cgf

- Raw text -