Delivered-To:	listarch-cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-Id:	<199902131802.MAA20124@modi.xraylith.wisc.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning:	modi.xraylith.wisc.edu: LOCALHOST.xraylith.wisc.edu [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol
To:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
cc:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: ld, dlls, and windows libraries
In-reply-to:	Your message of "Sat, 13 Feb 1999 12:51:58 EST."
	<199902131751 DOT MAA26487 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Sat, 13 Feb 1999 12:02:07 -0600
From:	Mumit Khan <khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT EDU>

DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> writes:
> It's in our master sources, it's all a matter of when we do the next
> full beta.  I'm not sure about the "--export-all" part; you may need
> to do "-Wl,--export-all" as that's a linker-specific option.  Unless
> someone wants to get it into egcs (hint).

I have it in my local sources, but I haven't submitted it yet. I'm trying
to figure out a way currently to have both the existing and the new method
coexist in the SPECS, and my conditionals came out wrong last time I
tried. Basically, it's a nested conditional based on whether '--dll' or
'--shared' is specified.

Any idea what I should call the --export-all option when invoked via GCC? 
Leave as is or something else like -mexport-all?? GCC specs will
essentially translate this to --export-all when calling the linker.

> It's *supposed* to only export non-static functions, not non-static
> data.

Ah, yes. Thanks.

Regards,
Mumit

- Raw text -