Mail Archives: cygwin/1999/01/21/00:19:38
>Yes for your first comment.
>Second, i was thanking him. He deserves many more thanks for his
>friendly and detailed answers whenever I wrote to him.
That's consistent with what I've seen over here on egcs-bugs!
>And by the way thanks to you to for this kind of e-mail.
Sure, well, it was mostly a sanity-check on my part. I'm still trying
to get my new email setup working, and have not felt "on top of" things
in g77-land for some time. Wanted to make sure there wasn't some
g77-defined way of doing fork() that I didn't know about, etc. :)
tq vm, (burley)
>From: Craig Burley <burley AT gnu DOT org>
>To: <Ssiddiqi AT InspirePharm DOT Com>
>Cc: <khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu>; <d DOT love AT dl DOT ac DOT uk>; <ssiddiqi AT ipass DOT net>;
><gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com>; <egcs-bugs AT cygnus DOT com>; <burley AT gnu DOT org>
>Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 1999 1:50 PM
>Subject: Re: G77 fork problems
>
>>>Actually G77 way of handeling FORK makes more sense to
>>>me -- personally.
>>
>>Could you elaborate? I thought Mumit had explained g77 *doesn't*
>provide
>>a wrapper for fork(). Do you mean you prefer the interface Mumit
>>provided in his (sample) wrapper? If so, he's the one to thank, not
>>g77!
>>
>> tq vm, (burley)
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".
- Raw text -