From:	burley AT gnu DOT org (Craig Burley)
Subject:	Re: G77 fork problems
20 Jan 1999 04:13:31 -0800 :
Message-ID:	<199901191850.NAA28451.cygnus.gnu-win32@melange.gnu.org>
References:	<004101be43b3$ae3c58b0$29acdfd0 AT InspirePharm DOT Com>
To:	Ssiddiqi AT InspirePharm DOT Com
Cc:	khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu, d DOT love AT dl DOT ac DOT uk, ssiddiqi AT ipass DOT net,
	gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com, egcs-bugs AT cygnus DOT com

>Actually G77 way of handeling FORK makes more sense to
>me -- personally.

Could you elaborate?  I thought Mumit had explained g77 *doesn't* provide
a wrapper for fork().  Do you mean you prefer the interface Mumit
provided in his (sample) wrapper?  If so, he's the one to thank, not
g77!

        tq vm, (burley)
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".

- Raw text -