delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/1999/01/12/10:07:17

From: david DOT smith AT home-free DOT demon DOT co DOT uk (David M. Smith)
Subject: [Q] B20.1 Executable sizes?
12 Jan 1999 10:07:17 -0800 :
Message-ID: <M5w3zLAuyym2Ewz4.cygnus.gnu-win32@home-free.demon.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com

Hi,

I have successfully rebuilt B20.1 under NT 4.0 and can use my version of
B20.1 to rebuild itself, so I guess things are reasonably OK.  My
question is, why are the executables that I built about 10 times the
size of the ones in the distribution (full.exe)?  For example:

My bash.exe             : 1,433 KB
Original bash.exe       : 386 KB
My gcc.exe              : 320 KB
Original gcc.exe        : 66 KB
My cygwin1.dll          : 5,911 KB
Original cygwin1.dll    : 446 KB

I noticed a flag that enables building shared libraries, is this the key
to the problem?  Do I have to disable building static libraries as well?

Any advice appreciated.

Regards,
David
-- 
David M. Smith

If knowledge costs, ignorance costs more.
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019