From:	khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu (Mumit Khan)
Subject:	Re: B19, performance using fopen()/fclose() on FAT16
24 Dec 1998 14:46:05 -0800 :
Message-ID:	<199812242018.OAA23931.cygnus.gnu-win32@modi.xraylith.wisc.edu>
References:	<3680FDDC DOT 5923BA32 AT aud DOT alcatel DOT com>
To:	John Blanton <john DOT blanton AT aud DOT alcatel DOT com>
Cc:	gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com

John Blanton <john DOT blanton AT aud DOT alcatel DOT com> writes:
> Conducting performance tests of several porting tools we noticed
> dramatically poor performance for the following case using FAT16 on
> Windows NT:

Thanks for the testcase and the timing results. Very interesting. I
would expect a significant slowdown using Cygwin, but didn't expect
this bad.

Here's what I get on Ppro 200, 128MB, NT SP3/FAT, no CYGWIN env var,
all binary mounts:

Cygwin B20:
    real    1m39.00s
    user    0m29.00s
    sys     1m4.00s

Specifying CYGWIN=nontea drops the time a few seconds.

MSVC
    real    0m15.00s
    user    0m3.00s
    sys     0m10.00s

UWIN
    real    0m53.00s
    user    0m17.00s
    sys     0m36.00s

> GNU-Win32           398.3
> Linux (FAT)                6.2
> Linux (Linux FS)          6.1
> U/WIN                      41.0
> Win32                       14.8

Your Cygwin time is much higher than mine for some reason.

Regards,
Mumit

-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".

- Raw text -