Mail Archives: cygwin/1998/12/23/09:09:21
Conducting performance tests of several porting tools we noticed
dramatically poor performance for the following case using FAT16 on
Windows NT:
for (count = 0; count < (int) REPETITIONS; count++)
{
fi = fopen("testfiles/file1", "a");
fclose(fi);
}
REPETITIONS is set to 100,000. The test requires over an hour to
complete. There is constant disk activity. Here are some test timings:
GNU-Win32 398.3
Linux (FAT) 6.2
Linux (Linux FS) 6.1
U/WIN 41.0
Win32 14.8
The times are in seconds and are combined user and system time as
reported by the UNIX time utility. Wall clock time for GNU-Win32 is
over an hour, as mentioned.
The tests were conducted again using NTFS on Windows NT, and the time
for GNU-Win32 dropped to about 70 seconds, still much higher than the
others.
John Blanton
Alcatel Corporate Research Center
Richardson, TX
972-996-2956
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".
- Raw text -