Mail Archives: cygwin/1998/10/29/13:04:51
vfOn Mon, Oct 26, 1998 at 08:54:55AM -0600, Bart Anderson wrote:
>
> I guess you decided mingw would have to be the "option" rather than
> -mno-mingw and leave the unixy thing the "option".
Sounds good to me...
Geoffrey Noer wrote:
>
> 2) The difficult thing about making Mingw the default is that that
> will hose builds of Unix packages without additional configure
> work (to add the -mcygwin flag at configure/make time). If all you
> care about is Mingw, it's easy to rewrite the gcc specs file to
> default the other way.
>
> 3) Defaulting to Mingw within the context of a new ix86-win32
> configuration cookie is still the long-term plan.
I don't understand (3), given (2). If defaulting to mingw is going to
require a whole lot of work, why not just leave gnu-win32 as the default?
--
Fergus Henderson <fjh AT cs DOT mu DOT oz DOT au> | "I have always known that the pursuit
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh> | of excellence is a lethal habit"
PGP: finger fjh AT 128 DOT 250 DOT 37 DOT 3 | -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".
- Raw text -