Mail Archives: cygwin/1998/10/01/08:01:35
On Wed, 30 Sep 1998, Fergus Henderson wrote:
> On 28-Sep-1998, Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com> wrote:
> >
> > Is their a reverse of the linker option --force-exe-suffix?
> >
> > I've tried --noforce-exe-suffix and that doesn't work.
>
> Did you try `--no-force-exe-suffix'?
> ^
Hmmm ... it's the language driver, *not* ld, that forces the .exe suffix on
cygwin32. The verbose option to the language driver is a good way to check these
things. Or, by running ld directly you can see what happens.
If your version of "ld" is forcing .exe suffix, you're perhaps somehow specifying
the --force-exe-suffix option somewhere.
For the language driver, the executable suffix is controlled by EXECUTABLE_SUFFIX
macro in the target config file(s). See gcc.c (convert_filename) for more info on
how the output name is munged. I'll be in favor of removing this forced suffix
addition for cygwin32, or at least provide an option to disable it in the driver
(but not for mingw32).
Regards,
Mumit
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".
- Raw text -