Mail Archives: cygwin/1998/09/28/05:46:35
---Arne Glenstrup <panic AT diku DOT dk> wrote:
>
> Now that we have established that we need some (in my opinion) dirty
> $(EXEEXT)-stuff, what is the consensus on how to use it with regards
to
> makefile targets and -o switches to compilers? Should a makefile look
> like this:
>
> EXEEXT = @EXEEXT@
>
> goal$(EXEEXT): goal.c
> $(CC) -o goal$(EXEEXT) goal.c
> cp goal$(EXEEXT) anothergoal$(EXEEXT)
> mv goal$(EXEEXT) yet.another.goal
>
This one would be most portable.
> or should it look like this:
>
> EXEEXT = @EXEEXT@
>
> goal: goal.c
> $(CC) -o goal goal.c
> cp goal$(EXEEXT) anothergoal$(EXEEXT)
> mv goal$(EXEEXT) yet.another.goal
>
This one make would have to add the .exe.
==
- \\||//
-----------o0O0--Earnie--0O0o------------
-- earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com --
-- http://freeyellow.com/members5/gw32 --
--------------ooo0O--O0ooo---------------
PS: Newbie's, you should visit my page.
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".
- Raw text -