From:	bje AT cygnus DOT com (Ben Elliston)
Subject:	Re: gcc produces foo.exe, not foo
25 Sep 1998 03:37:52 -0700 :
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.3.95.980925125815.11153A-100000.cygnus.gnu-win32@moshpit.cygnus.com>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 93 DOT 980923095850 DOT 1519C-100000 AT modi DOT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	Mumit Khan <khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu>
Cc:	Arne Glenstrup <panic AT diku DOT dk>, gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com

> As for the rationale for adding the automatic .exe, I'm somewhat in
> favor of, if not thrilled by, such "native compliance"; for mingw32, it
> makes perfect sense (must have .exe to jive with native system and also
> be executable by native shell); for cygwin32, bash can run programs
> with or without .exe, but have trouble when running with native shell.

Since MS seem to be trying to hide file extensions in their user
interfaces these days, I wonder how long it will be before they drop
the filename extensions on executables all-together and start using some
attributes in the file system?

Ben

-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".

- Raw text -