Mail Archives: cygwin/1998/08/21/15:12:25
In a message dated 8/20/98 4:39:47 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
sarnold AT coyote DOT rain DOT org writes:
> How about just documenting the behavior of the mount command?
and the similarities and differences of symlink (ln -s)
I get the impression that one can't count on it working after the contains of
a symlinked file are changed. Maybe that's why mount is recommended, but
mount is too permanent, while ln -s is too impermanent.
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".
- Raw text -