Mail Archives: cygwin/1998/08/21/14:26:28
Tim Newsham wrote:
> When you manually load a dll, and then perform a fork, the dll
> is not accessible from the child process. When you think about what
> is going on here, it makes sense. My question though is, is this the
> way fork should behave? Or should (could) the fork code reload the
> dll in the child process after a fork? It seems that this would
> more closely follow the expected fork semantics.
>
The dll will be reloaded on fork, if dll's startup code performs neccessary
initialization. See http://www.cygnus.com/misc/gnu-win32/dl-docs.html for
details.
--
Sergey Okhapkin, http://www.lexa.ru/sos
Moscow, Russia
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".
- Raw text -