From:	khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu (Mumit Khan)
Subject:	RE: -mwindows option
6 Jun 1998 18:47:59 -0700 :
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.93.980606104906.23964A-100000.cygnus.gnu-win32@modi.xraylith.wisc.edu>
References:	<000701bd910e$d4066340$9a1e01aa AT rankin-isdn-ws2 DOT sat DOT mot DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	Rick Rankin <rrankin AT primenet DOT com>
Cc:	gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com

On Fri, 5 Jun 1998, Rick Rankin wrote:

> I can certainly deal with that, but at best it seems inconsistent IMHO. It
> seem to the that the compiler driver program (i.e., gcc) should be smart
> enough to know which options to pass to which phase.
> 

Both -mwindows and -mdll are handled inconsistently, and will be fixed in
egcs-1.1 (the compile only stage will ignore the options).

Regards,
Mumit

-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".

- Raw text -