Mail Archives: cygwin/1998/05/15/16:45:58
On 13-May-1998, Michael Hirmke <mh AT mike DOT franken DOT de> wrote:
> Valery Fine [fine AT bnl DOT gov] wrote:
>
> >On 12 May 98 at 13:42, Kjeld DOT F DOT Christensen AT dxd DOT erics wrote:
> >
> >> On NT your process may lie anywhere, but never in ZERO, Thus you are
> >> not permitted to read from adress NULL. (You are not allowed to
> >> snoop around in the interrupt vetors!)
> >
> > Some int strlen(char *s) is started with
> >
> > int strlen(char *s){
> > if (s==0) return 0;
> ^
> *This is really incorrect behaviour* !
No, the behaviour in this case is UNDEFINED -- that means that
ANY behaviour is correct behaviour.
Of course, strlen() should be
size_t strlen(const char *s)
not
int strlen(char *s)
--
Fergus Henderson <fjh AT cs DOT mu DOT oz DOT au> | "I have always known that the pursuit
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh> | of excellence is a lethal habit"
PGP: finger fjh AT 128 DOT 250 DOT 37 DOT 3 | -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".
- Raw text -